The nomination of Sarah Palin to round out
the GOP ticket is truly a remarkable development - not because she's a woman,
or from Alaska, or whatever else you might think of her. The pick of Palin, age
44, means that neither major American political party is running a Baby Boomer
for either President or Vice President this year (Obama, born in 1961, is
borderline in terms of birth-year but solidly GenX in historical experience; Biden, age 66, is solidly
Silent, as is the elderly Senator
McCain).
Think about that. Boomers are a solid plurality of the
voting age population, and have been the decisive influence in the American
electorate since the late 1960s. For the past 16 years, they have dominated the
executive and legislative branches. Their values have defined political
discourse and political tactics in the modern age. And yet here, in what should
be the prime years of their leadership arc, they will go unrepresented in the
Presidency for the next four years, regardless of which party wins or whether
the Vice President is called upon to ascend to the Oval Office.
Sarah Palin, the neophyte governor of Alaska, is an
interesting case study in early GenX leadership. While the hoary 1990s-era
media stereotype of GenX focused on the ironic, alt-rock hipster - a very urban
perspective -the reality of the 53-million strong GenX cohort in America is
actually far more diverse. For one thing, we tend to be considerably more
conservative politically than either Boomers or Millennials. We came of age
during the Reagan era, when liberalism was in deep eclipse and the failures of
the Democratic era were in greater evidence than its successes.
Self-identification of young people with the GOP peaked in the early 90s, when
GenXers were in their 20s, and party ID has remained relatively stable as we approach
middle age.
Many GenX conservatives style themselves more as
libertarians than hard-line right wingers, befitting the streak of
self-reliance and independence that characterizes GenX across the political
spectrum. Palin, from the rugged northlands of Alaska, combines this with a strident
fundamentalist religiosity that some GenXers have embraced as an antidote
to the feel-good spiritualism of our Boomer elders. Her approach to governance
tends toward the pragmatic and transactional, as far as we can tell from the
limited record. She is happy to embrace slogans of reform and fiscal
discipline, and just
as happy to cut deals in the interests of her state and city when the
opportunities present themselves. Her prime-time debut as a major political figure
last night also indicates that she relishes the GenX style of blunt,
often abrasive communication and biting sarcasm.
Palin's hardcore, unvarnished GenX traits pose an
interesting contrast to the more polished Obama, who packages his basically pragmatic,
let's-solve-the-problem approach in more Boomer-friendly idealistic rhetoric.
He offers an antidote to the rigidly-ideological and authoritarian excesses of
recent Boomer leadership without calling undue attention to his own X-ish
attributes, and makes a virtue of the diversity and adversity of his upbringing,
which in fact fits a fairly recognizable generational experience for many
fellow Xers.
This contrast has some interesting implications. Obama
characteristically finesses his differences with the Boomer majority, while
Palin goes for the full-on, in-your-face GenX experience. However, I wonder if
it has occurred to McCain and his handlers that Boomers (and Millennials for
that matter) have never shown much affection for the GenX attitude and
approach. Boomer women in particular have issues with their self-styled "post-feminist"
GenX counterparts, whom I have heard many older women claim, take the
sacrifices of their elders for granted and threaten hard-won progress by
embracing self-limiting and oppressive ideology in exchange for social and
economic advancement.
The impact of all this remains to be seen. Boomers may not
have a place on the stage in this year's Presidential election, but they remain
the key voting bloc. How they decide between the various Xers and Silents
offered up for their consideration will determine which style of leadership
will predominate in post-Boomer America, at least for the next few years.